Homage to THOMAS CROWN: DUPLICITY Strikes a Nostalgic Note

Made for $60M but grossing only $40M, Duplicity was a 2009 box office flop about two former spies turned corporate security experts who team up to defraud their respective companies while wondering whether they are being conned by each other.

Without commenting on the quality of the film, I did want to discuss the style of the trailer which is inspired by (or pays homage to) the campaign for the 1968 Steve McQueen/Faye Dunaway hit, THE THOMAS CROWN AFFAIR, a film likewise featuring sexy stars romancing and conning each other against the backdrop of a high-stakes heist.

The music cue is ‘60’s cocktail: xylophone, wood block, brass, drums, and guitar deliver a percussive, jazzy and suspenseful sound bed. In the course of presenting Julia Roberts and Clive Owen in Rome, New York and the Bahamas, as they run a triple play on their corporate employers, 100+ edit decisions are made in the 2:30 trailer. (I say “more than” because it’s hard to keep track given how quickly and simultaneously optical fx and edits are taking place.) A good deal of story information is delivered via dialogue and shot selection, but the graphic design is responsible for the non-verbal presentation of the film’ s “style” and “attitude.”

As for those design elements, big block letters (almost to the point of abstraction) in white, with smaller blue words within, convey stars, title and copy appeals. Whereas Duplicity uses diegetic dialogue to carry the burden of plot, The Thomas Crown Affair uses a Voice Over artist, as well as cards, for the same purpose. In Duplicity, the large block letter in white repeats the first letter of the smaller word in blue. The words “Stealing” and “Perfect,” however, are in black block letters, as an indication, perhaps, of their significance as shorthand for the story.

This trailer is distinguished by its use of optical effects, a choice that has become shorthand for nostalgia when not an explicit evocation of period. The classic wipe and the diagonal wipe (from the center going up left and down right) are used, as well as the expanding circle or IRIS effect. On screen, one image joins another, before pushing it out. Throughout, visual and verbal information are layered, with graphics and scenes overlapping and sharing the screen, implying the complexity of story and the emotional overlay of romance with greed and suspicion.

The split screen also makes its appearance—a technique developed by Eisenstein in the 20’s, but “rediscovered” in the 60’s by trailermakers like Jeff Kanew and Pablo Ferro, working on Madison Avenue in New York, who embraced it for the newly re-imagined mode of movie advertising. It’s a great way to tell two (or more) stories simultaneously or one quickly.

With respect to other editing choices, fades, dissolves, cuts to white (once) and cuts to black are exploited for emphasis, connection and termination. The trailer focuses on looking and listening, with shots of surveillance video, photographs, cell-phone captures joined by shots of lips to ears and satellite antennae for broadcast data, all of which underline the spy intrigue subject matter.

Romance is conveyed in faces and face to face transitions, notably, the match cutting between her laugh and his laugh, or his walking toward the screen followed by hers. The Godard-inspired jump cuts, which denaturalize movement while minimizing duration of unimportant shots, indicate the playful, theatrical quality of the entertainment being advertised.

The corporations targeted by our protagonists are represented by their respective CEO’s, whose personal animus is conveyed by a slow motion fight sequence, which personalizes and dramatizes whatever vague, probably non-essential details we learn about their businesses.

I invite you to take a look at the trailer for the Thomas Crown Affair, to see if you think I’ve made a compelling case for what I’m calling Duplicity’s homage. Pay attention, in particular to the use of split screen, the focus on anxious “romance” between leads who are “gaming” each other, the use of close-ups, innuendo, talk of dollars, and the chemistry that ignites (or fails to) between the leads.

I like this trailer. I like these stars, separately and together. I like this subject matter, which seems perennially popular as a star vehicle. But audiences, apparently, didn’t like the feature, however skillful the marketing materials.

Creative Commons License
movietrailers101 by Fred Greene is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Posted in Readings | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Marketing Music: A Baroque orchestral master-work written to attract and retain audiences

Composer, Entrepreneur, Musical Trailer-Maker???

One of the defining aspects of movie trailers is that they occupy the same medium as the film they advertise. Indeed, that is one of their distinctive formal qualities. A book review, with excerpts from the book discussed, would be similar in its appeal. (A book trailer?) By contrast, a TV commercial for soap powder, or a printed flyer for a movie, operate in different media and are less viscerally and generically compelling as a result.

In my tireless search to establish the genealogy of trailers, I recently learned about a series of orchestral musical compositions written expressly to be played during intermission of the performance of other works by the same composer as an inducement to patrons to attend and enjoy the “featured” works that were struggling to sell tickets during their extended run.

The composer was the immortal Georg Friedrich Handel, then resident in London, where he was building a reputation as the foremost composer of his day. An entrepreneurial musician, he had his own company, for which he composed operas, oratorios and masques. His oratorios (like opera, they feature an orchestra, solo instrumentalists and vocalists, but do so without costumes, staging or choreographed movement) and Masques were not selling out as he anticipated, so he composed 12 Grand Concerto’s to be performed during the intermission. These were intended to draw paying audiences to his performances at Lincoln’s Inn Fields.

Now here we have, if not exactly a “sample” of the “feature” that is being presented, promotional materials in the same “general” medium of the “product” being advertised, written by the same composer, and used to attract and retain audiences. Genre and provenance are here exploited for their claim on audience’s attention and interest. The Concerto Grossi were immediately popular and they seemed to have done the job of putting butts in seats for the oratorio and masque performances.

One wonders whether magic lantern shows (the precursors to motion pictures) ever used slides or series of slides to advertise upcoming presentations? Or, if a dramatist ever included a plug for an upcoming productions in the script of his or her play? Indeed, by the same logic whereby series and sequels constitute implicit “previews” for themselves, the History Plays of Shakespeare might be seen as themselves advertisements in theatrical guise for their sequels or prequels.

Comments, refutations, criticisms invited.

Creative Commons License
movietrailers101 by Fred Greene is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Posted in Observations and Provocations | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Trailer Editing: A lot like feature film editing, only more so

[youtube=www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPdFDfQyi_c]

With the exception of the “Grid,” described below, which is exclusive to trailer editing, the approaches, techniques or principles described below are used by feature film editors and trailers editors alike. In this post, I wanted to highlight some of the more salient methods whereby trailer editors convey story information, elicit emotion, engage understanding and arouse interest in their audiences.

(Thanks to James Monaco’s HOW TO READ FILM: Movies, Media and Beyond, Oxford Univ. Press, for his definitions and explanations.)

In Monaco’s discussion of Contemporary Hollywood editing style, he describes these familiar styles of montage:
• Parallel montage – which allows filmmaker to alternate between two stories or scenes or sequences that may not be related spatially or temporally, cross-cutting between them and thereby producing a third meaning from the combination of these two.
• Accelerated Montage –a special type of parallel montage in which interest in a scene is heightened and brought to a climax through progressively shorter alternations of shots between two subjects (often in chase scenes). In accelerated montage, the pace of shot presentation is understood to imply excitement, suspense and energy. (See: The Grid, below)
• Involuted montage – a montage that does not respect chronology (e.g. the narrative elements do not necessarily occur in diegetic order or temporal sequence.) Repetition, flashback, or flashforward are all storytelling possibilities in this kind of montage.

[Don’t forget Monaco’s admonition that: “Each of these extensions of the montage codes looks toward the creation of something other than simple chronology in the montage itself, a factor very little emphasized in classic découpage continuity cutting.”]

• Match cut: A match cut links two disparate scenes by the repetition of an action, gesture, graphic pattern, or duplication of the mise en scene. One of the most famous examples comes from 2001: A Space Odyssey, in which a bone tossed into the air by our hominid ancestors is matched, in shape and rotation, to the traveling space station. According to Monaco this cut “unites human prehistory with the future,” insofar as both bone and space station represent human tools, or extensions of human capabilities.

Match cuts are especially useful in trailers insofar as they establish pattern, connection and thematic unity among shots that may be pulled from opposite ends of the film and different aspects of the story, but which are combined in the trailer to produce a coherent marketing message. See, in particular, the trailer for WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE.

KULESHOV EFFECT:

The Kuleshov Effect (named after Lev Kuleshov, a Soviet era director and founder of the world’s first Film School) describes a critical discovery about audience psychology, whereby any series of shots presented in the absence of an establishing shot prompts the spectator to infer a spatial or psychological whole on the basis of seeing only portions of the space. (Ex: If we see an actor looking, then an object shown, we presume that the actor is looking at and reacting to the object. If we see an actor’s face and then a shot of something else, we assume emotional connection or relationship between them.) Almost every film as indeed, almost every trailer, relies on this effect, especially since establishing shots are often dispensed with in trailer editing.

THE GRID:

The Grid is an essential editing approach used within trailers since at least the 1960’s. Essentially, the Grid is a kind of parallel montage used to compress and accelerate the presentation of story information, emotion and excitement. The Grid results from intercutting one scene with scenes and/or dialogue that are not continuous with it, relying on the Kuleshov effect to establish a kind of counterpoint to the first story line, or an elaboration of it in the mind of the viewer. In literary terms, the grid is a kind of a metaphor or metonymy, establishing relationships between different things on the basis of comparison or contiguity. The power of the grid is in its conveyance of substantial amounts of plot and detail in a brief, visually dynamic fashion.

See the trailer from NIGHT OF THE IGUANA (1964) above, in particular, the scenes where Richard Burton is recklessly driving a school bus.

BRACKET or ‘ALTERNATING’ SYNTAGMA (i.e. a unit of narrative meaning)

Defined by film theorist Christian Metz as “a series of very brief scenes representing occurrences that the film gives as typical examples of a same order or reality, without in any way chronologically locating them in relation to each other.” [Film Language: A semiotics of the Cinema, p. 126] the bracket syntagma is a handy definition of trailer editing generally. (Thanks to trailer scholar Lisa Kernan for this insight.) My only qualification is that in trailers, the “chronological location” of one scene in relation to an other is implied by the marketing message and trailer formula, rather than imposed by the film texts selected.

MONTAGE

The French word for what we in the US and England call “editing,” montage is the critical technique in film editing in which a series of short shots are edited into a sequence to condense space, time, and information. It is usually used to suggest the passage of time, rather than to create symbolic meaning as it does in Soviet montage theory.
• The combination of shots and/or scenes makes a third or “nth +1” meaning from the original meanings of the “n” pieces of film combined.
• Russian director and film theorist Vsevolod Pudovkin categorized the various kinds of montage according to their structure and the interpretive meaning: contrast, parallelism, symbolism, simultaneity, and leitmotif. We can see examples of all of the above in films and in trailers.
• The first dedicated trailer editors were the studio “montage editors” of the 1920’s, who, when not busy with a given film, were enlisted to work with outtakes (rather than the print) from which they created movie marketing materials.

Creative Commons License
movietrailers101 by Fred Greene is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Posted in Introductory and Reference Post | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment