THE MOVIE TRAILER & THE BIRTH OF MODERN PROPAGANDA – Notes toward an essay

A PROPAGANDA FILM Produced by the CPI or Creel Commission

I’ve recently had a paper accepted to a special edition of the academic film journal FRAMES, due out in Spring of ’13 and dedicated entirely to movie promotion and marketing, a first ever!

Ever since writing about propaganda and movie trailers, I’ve wanted to research the introduction of movie trailers into film marketing in the 1910’s and 20’s relative to the application and exploitation of modern propaganda techniques (in a/v and print media, among others) during WWI and its articulation in the disciplines of public opinion and public relations which came hard on the conclusion of hostilities. With the indulgence of my readers, I’m going to use my blog to explore some of the primary sources of this history.

Today, I’ve excerpted several paragraphs from George Creel‘s triumphant account of his work as leader of the Committee on Public Information, a position to which he was appointed by President Woodrow Wilson in 1917 and tasked with fighting for the “moral verdict” of mankind. (In the words of Newton Baker, Secretary of the War and a member of the Committee, “The whole business of mobilizing the mind of the world so far as American participation in the war was concerned was in a sense the work of the Committee on Public In-formation.”) In the passages below, Creel describes the campaign that he supervised. I think that a studio marketing executive would recognize and be impressed by the scale, scope, energy, planning, targeting and comprehensiveness of it. I’ve added commentary in brackets “[ ]” after each paragraph.

FROM GEORGE CREEL’S

    How We Advertised America

, Harper & Brothers, New York, 1920.

While America’s summons was answered without question by the citizenship as a whole, it is to be remembered that during the three and a half years of our neutrality the land had been torn by a thousand divisive prejudices, stunned by the voices of anger and confusion, and muddled by the pull and haul of opposed interests. These were conditions that could not be permitted to endure. What we had to have was no mere surface unity, but a passionate belief in the justice of America’s cause that should weld the people of the United States into one white-hot mass instinct with fraternity, devotion, courage, and deathless determination. [emphasis, mine] The war-will, the will-to-win, of a democracy depends upon the degree to which each one of all the people of that democracy can concentrate and consecrate body and soul and spirit in the supreme effort of service and sacrifice. What had to be driven home was that all business was the nation’s business, and every task a common task for a single purpose.

Starting with the initial conviction that the war was not the war of an administration, but the war of one hundred million people, and believing that public support was a matter of public understanding, we opened up the activities of government to the inspection of the citizenship. A voluntary censorship agreement safeguarded military information of obvious value to the enemy, but in all else the rights of the press were recognized and furthered. Trained men, at the center of effort in every one of the warmaking branches of government, reported on progress and achievement, and in no other belligerent nation was there such absolute frankness with respect to every detail of the national war endeavor.

[Advertising is, first and foremost news. A good “spot” must inform.]

As swiftly as might be, there were put into pamphlet form America’s reasons for entering the war, the meaning of America, the nature of our free institutions, our war aims, likewise analyses of the Prussian system, the purposes of the imperial German government, and full exposure of the enemy’s misrepresentations, aggressions, and barbarities. Written by the country’s foremost publicists [emphsasis, mine], scholars, and historians, and distinguished for their conciseness, accuracy, and simplicity, these pamphlets blew as a great wind against the clouds of confusion and misrepresentation.

[We call these “strong arguments,” the compelling claims for an emotional, aesthetic, or intellectual response. I love how Creel begins his list of “foremost” intellectuals with the category of publicists. That’s a first, and probably a last.]

Money could not have purchased the volunteer aid that was given freely, the various universities lending their best men and the National Board of Historical Service placing its three thousand members at the complete disposal of the Committee. Some thirty-odd booklets, covering every phase of America’s ideals, purposes, and aims, were printed in many languages other than English. Seventy-five millions reached the people of America, and other millions went to every corner of the world, carrying our defense and our attack.

[Talk about interactivity, and thought/opinion leaders! These folk were the fanboys of their age; fangirls, no doubt, as well.]

The importance of the spoken word was not underestimated. A speaking division toured great groups like the Blue Devils, Pershing’s Veterans, and the Belgians, arranged mass-meetings in the communities, conducted forty-five war conferences from coast to coast, co-ordinated the entire speaking activities of the nation, and as- sured consideration to the crossroads hamlet as well as to the city. The Four Minute Men, an organization that will live in history by reason of its originality and effectiveness, commanded the volunteer services of 75,000 speakers, operating in 5,200 communities, and making a total of 755,190 speeches, every one having the carry of shrapnel.

[Advertising gets the first word, but the last word, is Word of mouth, as they say. YOu might think of these speakers as street teams, spreading the promotional message from town to town, corner to corner, passerby by passerby.]

With the aid of a volunteer staff of several hundred translators, the Committee kept in direct touch with the foreign-language press, supplying selected articles designed to combat ignorance and disaffection. It organized and directed twenty-three societies and leagues designed to appeal to certain classes and particular foreign-language groups, each body carrying a specific message of unity and enthusiasm to its section of America’s adopted peoples.

[The press, in particular the foreign press. Where would H’wood be without the Golden Globes! Marketing is truly international.]

It planned war exhibits for the state fairs of the United States, also a great series of interallied war expositions that brought home to our millions the exact nature of the struggle that was being waged in France. In Chicago alone two million people attended in two weeks, and in nineteen cities the receipts aggregated $1,432,261.36.

[Museum cross promotion. Brilliant!]

The Committee mobilized the advertising forces of the country press, periodical, car, and outdoor for the patriotic campaign that gave millions of dollars’ worth of free space to the national service. It assembled the artists of America on a volunteer basis for the production of posters, window-cards, and similar material of pictorial publicity for the use of various government departments and patriotic societies. A total of 1,438 drawings was used. It issued an official daily newspaper, serving every de- partment of government, with a circulation of one hundred thousand copies a day. For official use only, its value was such that private citizens ignored the supposedly prohibitive subscription price, subscribing to the amount of $77,622.58.

[Press, print and pictorial assets. The prestige of a daily publication. That’s provenance.]

It organized a bureau of information for all persons who sought direction in volunteer war-work, in acquiring knowl- edge of any administrative activities, or in approaching business dealings with the government. In the ten months of its existence it gave answers to eighty -six thousand requests for specific information. It gathered together the leading novelists, essayists, and publicists of the land, and these men and women, without payment, worked faithfully in the production of brilliant, comprehensive articles that went to the press as syndicate features.

[Information, resources, thought leadership mobilized around a product roll-out, in this case Americanism and thus the justification for our entry into World War I.]

One division paid particular attention to the rural press and the plate-matter service. Others looked after the specialized needs of the labor press, the religious press, and the periodical press. The Division of Women’s War W r ork prepared and issued the information of peculiar interest to the women of the United States, also aiding in the task of organizing and directing.

[Niche Marketing. Demographic and psychographic approaches exploited!]

Another propaganda film produced by the Creel Commission


Through the medium of the motion picture, America’s war progress, as well as the meanings and purposes of democracy, were carried to every community in the United States and to every corner of the world. “Pershing’s Crusaders,” “America’s Answer,” and “Under Four Flags” were types of feature films by which we drove home America’s resources and determinations, while other pictures, showing our social and industrial life, made our free institutions vivid to foreign peoples. [emphasis, mine] From the domestic showings alone, under a fair plan of distribution, the sum of $878,215 was gained, which went to support the cost of the campaigns in foreign countries where the exhibitions were necessarily free. Another division prepared and distributed still photographs and stereopticon slides to the press and public.

[I’ve researched the above mentioned films in UCLA Film Archive, one of the best in the world, and no trailers exist for any of them. If anyone know where to see such a/v marketing materials, I’d love to learn. I suspect that no trailers were made for these films, since Hollywood only began regular production of trailers in 1916, and didn’t mandate them for all releases till 1919. ]

Creative Commons License
movietrailers101 by Fred Greene is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Posted in Articles and Interviews, Introductory and Reference Post, Observations and Provocations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

THE MASTER TRAILER: Selling a tortured bromance and sidestepping the Scientology controversy

I’ve been itching to see the film since I first learned of the production and its promotion (via a 3-4 minute tease) at Cannes. I admire Paul Thomas Anderson‘s work and am fascinated by Scientology (which, although I have no admiration for its doctrine, practice or secrecy, is, I freely confess, an exemplary neighbor: I live in the heart of Hollywood, where they own much of the best buildings on Hollywood Boulevard. They keep their real estate beautifully and since their comings and goings are silent, invisible and mysterious, they contribute only negligibly to congestion.)

But enough about my proximity to the proximite subject of Mr. Anderson’s latest film (according to reviews and publicity, it is a fictional portrait of a period in the life of L. Ron Hubbard, founder of Scientology); let’s look at the trailer.

Talent, provenance, character, story, visual art and cinematic virtuosity are the chief appeals of this trailer which highlights the gorgeous cinematography and period-evocative production characteristic of Anderson’s best work. Joaquin Phoenix, returning after a premature retirement from the movie, is Freddie Quell, a troubled, war-scarred veteran and the putative subject of the trailer: he is a problem to be resolved by the plot, an opportunity to be exploited by Philip Seymour Hoffman in the role of Lancaster Dodd (The Master) and a danger to be managed, skirted and left behind by Amy Adams in the role of Peggy Dodd, the Master’s loyal and fiercely protective wife.

Quell has been decommissioned from a military hospital, his mental injuries acknowledged by the authorities if not adequately treated. Dodd takes on Quell as a test case of the therapeutic value of the ideas he is in the process of promulgating and propagating, his recovery or reclamation offering a demonstration of their validity and application.

Peggy is a realist, recognizing Quell’s fascination for her husband and the temptation; Dodd is an idealist and an egoist, convinced he can save and transform this broken man. Quell is tormented and self-destructive, but also charismatic and a feral force of nature. The triangle involves erotics, marital jealousy and protectiveness, as well as the complexities of transference and countertransference familiar to the analytical situation. The connection between Quell and Dodd–erotics sublimated in violence–stands in contrast with Dodd’s relation to his wife, Peggy, who, with her floral, high-necked dresses, tight lips and coiled bun is hardly a figure of sexual attraction or availability.

What the trailer highlights, apart from these conflicts is ACTING (emphasis intended) by Academy Award calibre talents in a film by an acclaimed director and multiple nominee. The controversy that surrounded the making and release of the film, has been relegated to an oblique reference in a passage of dialogue: A invitee to an official function (I don’t recognize the actor or know his role) distinguishes scientific debate from the certainties of the cult. In the next shot, although not contiguous or in response, except that it’s adjacent in the trailer, Adam’s expresses her disdain that yet again her husband is required to “explain” and urges “attack” as the best means of defending his work.

As she says attack, we see Quell knocking open a door and rushing through. Though his adversary or object is unclear, the suggestion is that he is to be used as an instrument of Dodd, his violence marshaled in service to the movement that Dodd is building. This may, of course, be the trailer’s story rather than the film’s. I look forward to finding out. Interestingly, Dodd’s son, Val, (Jesse Plemons) is the voice of explicit skepticism about his father’s philosophy/psychology, insisting to an incredulous and hostile Quell that Dodd is merely “making it all up as he goes along.”

Ultimately, the trailer closes on opposing judgments about the possibility of helping and reclaiming Quell. Dodd asserts that failing to do so reqpresents a failure of his own precept; Peggy supposes that perhaps Quell is “beyond help,” and “insane” as we are left with a final shot of the man in question, turning around and squinting at the camera, shirtless and on the beach, as the 40’s vocal track subsides and a black card with the title comes up. It is yet another of many haunting images, most of Phoenix who has been earning breathless reviews.

Given the recent celebrity stories and scandals surrounding Scientology (re: Mr. Cruise, for example), I find that I’m much more interested in the story that this trailer presents about the film, than I would be about a trailer for a straight biopic on L. Ron or the origins of Scientology. These characters and these stories are distinct from controversy about, prejudice for/against the church, and instead explore a complex and compelling real-world experiment with psychological theory and interpersonal dynamics. Given the acting and directorial talent assembled, it’s a subject I’m eager to see developed.

Creative Commons License
movietrailers101 by Fred Greene is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Posted in Readings | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

MOVIE TRAILERS IN THE NEWS: KPCC (Pasadena) broadcasts 2 segments on the worlds favorite advertising

“Battle: Los Angeles. It’s a generic alien invasion pop-corn flick, but the trailer was different. Instead of three minutes of explosions and witty one-liners, it featured dramatic scenes of UFOs scored to a calm and eerie song.” –From

    Inside one of LA’s Biggest Movie Trailer Houses

Recently, reporter Sanden Totten of the Brand and Martinez show (KPCC, 89.7, weekdays, 9-11, am) aired two segments about the movie trailer business, mostly rehashing materials that will be familiar to readers of this blog, but also highlighting the work of one of the biggest, full-servie movie marketing (and more) boutiques in the industry: Cimarron. READ THE STORY HERE!

The next day (Sept. 12th), Totten reported a piece on the history and evolution of movie trailers. It includes an interview with Evelyn Watters, who along with her sister founded and operates the Golden Trailer Awards, now entering their 14th year of celebrating coming attractions, movie posters and movie marketing generally.

The report also highlights a scene from the 1915 drama, The Red Circle, which it calls the “earliest known surviving movie trailer.” In the documentary that I researched and wrote, we argued that a filmed card from the 1912 serial, What Happened to Mary, represents the oldest known surviving trailer, and described the preview for the Red Circle as the first trailer that was recognizable as a trailer in the sense we use the word today. Either way, I’m thrilled that our subject continues to provide compelling stories for local journalists and arts and cultural entertainment for local audiences.

Creative Commons License
movietrailers101 by Fred Greene is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Posted in Articles and Interviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment