TITLE SEQUENCES – The Cart that Pulls the Horse

I just visited the Art of the Title website, about which I’ve written in a previous post, to see what that brilliant & energetic collective of filmmakers and graphic designers are up to, and was gratified to see expanded content, including interviews with distinguished designers and appreciations of “classic” sequences. Of course, Saul Bass, figures prominently.

Check out the cover article on the opening titles for North by Northwest, which Bass created for Mr. Hitchcock’s MGM masterpiece. Proposing that “intersections” is the matrix that inspires (gives birth to) this sequence, author Ben Radatz argues that:

“It is appropriate, then, that Saul Bass establishes this theme in both the tone and design of the main title sequence — his second Hitchcock outing, following Vertigo the previous year. Almost immediately, the open canvas of forest green is jailed by a series of intersecting lines, setting the ground rules for the sequence by corralling the sans serif title blocks into vertical columns, rising and falling as though tethered to one another.

The sequence is split into three distinct tiers — the first being entirely graphic, with the titles superimposed over the gridded background. In the second, the graphics dissolve into the reflective façade of the United Nations building in New York City — a prominent location in the film — perfectly mimicking its orthographic window framework. The third tier brings us down to ground level, observing the anonymous masses navigating the Big Apple.

This progression from cold abstraction to perceived reality — symbolically reflected in the building’s façade — to up-close and personal parallels Thornhill’s journey through the film, mirroring both his plight and his changing identity over its course. It also draws the audience into human-scale conflict, where commuters do their best to ignore each other unless compelled otherwise, resulting in hostility. Bernard Hermann’s big, climactic score gives the sequence a sense of increasing urgency, turning up the volume in concert with the march of the crowd.”

The rest of the article is eminently worth reading. Also featured on the front page is an interviews with Chuck Braverman, designer of the titles for Soylent Green, and a look at the 2012 Emmy Nominations for title graphics.

Check it out!

Creative Commons License
movietrailers101 by Fred Greene is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Posted in Articles and Interviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

GARDEN STATE Teaser: There’s Beauty in the Breakdown

I’ve gone back to IFC’s list of 50 great trailers for today’s post. Here’s what critic Brandon Kim says about the 1:15 teaser for Garden State, which it ranks #14:

“Garden State” never managed the darkness and gravity that could have made it as memorable as “The Graduate,” a film with which writer/director/star Zach Braff would no doubt like his to be associated. But the Frou Frou-scored teaser encapsulates all of that wonderful promise of generation-summing angst, and without a word of dialog. The airplane scene intro, the funeral, the daisy chain of children crossing the street — the moody, wistful collage of images and the crowded nightmare of the modern medicated world are a jumble around Braff’s Andrew Largeman, who’s too numbed to notice. The secret to the teaser’s hypnotic quality is that it’s cut particularly well to the song’s beats, with gestures and edits aligning with rhythms and Imogen Heap’s drawn-out note before the chorus perfectly paired with that primal scream pullback over the rainy quarry.”

As Kim points out, the emotional message of the film is conveyed by the music cue, “Let Go,” (vocals by Imogen Heap), with a lyric “there’s beauty in the breakdown,” that would appear to express Braff’s character’s bittersweet assessment of his existence. (It also offers a crack branding slogan for the State of New Jersey.)

As for bringing in the audiences, to scenes of Braff and his A-list co-stars, Natalie Portman, Peter Sarsgaard and Ian Holm emoting winningly amidst suburban anomie, the teaser adds two florid critical reactions: “Writer-director Zach Braff has a genuine filmmaker’s eye and is loaded with talent,” from David Ansen of Newsweek; and “Beautiful and funny…intimate and real,” from Erik Childress at Efilmcritic.com.

Lest a viewer be alienated by the depressive tenor of the visuals and the music cue or alarmed at the opening shot of the interior of a plane with emergency oxygen deployed and the passengers panicked, the second to last shot shows Portman and Braff embracing in an empty baggage claim area, a promise that the film is not a tragedy and that love and life are, at least temporarily, triumphant.

There is no copy and no voice over, apart from Ms. Heap, but the generic markers of “coming of age” story are all over it, whether the images of Braff’s mournful mug, isolated and still in the midst of society and activity. The cue, again, does yeoman’s work here. (Confession: I just added it to my Spotify playlist and intend to create a Imogen Heap channel on Pandora.)

Lastly, and on a related note, I’ve begun working full time for a small boutique movie marketing company, SizzlePitch, which I’ve mentioned before in earlier blog posts. It’s a welcome new professional challenge, given that I’m not only the in-house writer, but part of the creative marketing team that decides on direction and emphasis for the projects that come to us. To date, I’ve been maintaining my twice a week posting regimen, but I may back off to once a week, or exert myself to write less each time. Time will tell. More about SizzlePitch, as our business develops and my insight grows.

Creative Commons License
movietrailers101 by Fred Greene is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Posted in Classic Readings (of classic film trailers), Readings | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AFI’s list of GREATEST TRAILERS? #40, SOUTH PARK: BIGGER LONGER & UNCUT Teaser

A couple of years back, the AFI put together a list of the 100 greatest trailers of all time, with short descriptions and appreciations of each. It’s a great “filmography” for trailer afficionados and a reliable inspiration to my own bi-weekly posting.

Here’s what the AFI critic said about the :53 teaser for the first South Park movie:

The late, great Don “Thunder Throat” LaFontaine, king of the voiceover, commands as this teaser begins (and as the camera slowly zooms into the screen of a fancy home computer, circa 1999): “As we near the millennium, the tools for visual effects and animation are evolving at an exponential rate…” A laser-guided, 3-D animatic is being rendered in close-up before our eyes, and we’re told that Paramount has enlisted the help of the world’s top animators, with a budget of over $630 million, to bring us “the most advanced animation ever seen by the human eye.”

Cue the punchline: the computer matrix system has formed the eye of a defiantly lo-fi Eric Cartman — by that time as iconic an animated character as Bart Simpson — goose-stepping on an empty black background. “I will do the German dance for you,” he sings in his nasally whine, “it’s fun and gay and tra-la-la.” Irreverent as ever, the “South Park” boys pull another fast one on their audience, making us laugh by holding a mirror up to our own lemming mentality for bigger, faster, sleeker blockbuster bombast. –Aaron Hillis

Mr. Hillis neglects to mention the music cue, “Tommy the Cat,” by Primus, which follows hard and loud on the conclusion of Cartman’s German Dance performance. A smash zoom-out title graphic obliterates Cartman. The Primus cue, a funky-guitar line followed by funky-punkish percussion and vocals, plays over the white lettered title card on black background, before a fast-zoom restores Cartman (presumably lost to sight among the zooming titles) to center screen where he demands, “Who the Hell are you people?” A smash cut to a release date card “Coming 1999” ends the trailer, the Paramount name and logo barely discernible in small font along the bottom.

While the AFI critic’s claim about the teaser’s irreverence is indisputable, I do not think the target viewer and ultimate audience is motivated to see the film by the hilarity of recognizing his or her own “lemming mentality” and desire “for bigger, faster, sleeker blockbuster” fare. The teaser is not hilarious so much as baldly parodic and defiantly random, qualities familiar and appealing to fans of the series. Since the teaser, as a teaser, is fundamentally a vehicle for awareness, for staking a claim in the mental real-estate of the potential movie goer, it needn’t explain, although it must compel, whether by inexplicability, mystery or conceptual brilliance.

In this teaser, specifically, what is exploited is familiarity with and enjoyment of the South Park sensibility as a recommendation for a feature length film about the South Park characters and their world. We learn nothing about the plot, nothing about the visual spectacle being heralded, although Cartman surely constitutes an earnest of character and genre in the anticipated film. “Trust me,” it says, “you will want to know more and see more,” which is what a teaser is supposed to do.

But in making this promise, it relies primarily on parody of trailer formulae and bombast, making fun of the promotional machinery of the movie industry, rather than our own implication in that phenomenon. For a viewer unfamiliar with South Park, Cartman’s German Dance must have been incomprehensible, not to mention appalling!

This preview, then, is not only irreverent–it’s audacious, obnoxious even, given Cartman’s hostility toward his would-be fans. Remember that 13 years ago, moviegoers were justifiably skeptical about the cinematic pretensions of Mssrs. Parker and Stone, and Eric Cartman was not yet then the cultural touchstone he has become. In 1999, there was no reference point for a South Park feature, apart from the mixed track record of other cult tv series that made the leap to the big screen.

The official trailer, irreverent like the teaser which advertises it, is much more forthcoming about story and scale and the ribald amusements of an adult cartoon. While a teaser is free to tease, a trailer has to reveal at least some of its trump cards in order to sustain the trick of building suspense by incremental and deferred disclosure.

Somehow, Paramount was convinced that the uninitiated viewer would remember and wonder about this teaser, even if he or she had no context for making sense of it. 13 years later, we see, to our continuing delight, that Paramount’s risk paid off. Parker and Stone did indeed have the goods, which they have regularly and generously distributed ever since to grateful TV audiences, film-goers and Broadway ticket buyers alike.

Creative Commons License
movietrailers101 by Fred Greene is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Posted in Classic Readings (of classic film trailers), Observations and Provocations, Readings | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment