Avengers AND Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows post-release TV Spots: Jump on the Bandwagon!


AVENGERS TV SPOT, Released May 8th.

Last week, after AVENGERS shattered opening weekend box office records in the United States, the trailermakers cut a :17 spot to exploit the extraordinary news. Presumably, the distributor had contingency plans for just this kind of post-release TV spot and probably gave the go-ahead on Sunday, as the numbers indicated what it had on its hands. It’s a terrifically clever and effective :17 seconds of promotion, which regardless of the anticipation and preparation, is an impressive achievement for no more than a day or so of editing, voice over, graphic design and post.

The trailer unfolds along two avenues, with voice over copy asserting that Avengers has experienced the #1 opening of all time and that it’s one of the best reviewed movies of the year. The first marketing approach is the “bandwagon” appeal, which basically says that everybody in America is seeing this movie; it’s a phenomenon you shouldn’t miss. The second mode of persuasion is the “appeal to authority,” whereby “expert” opinion is adduced in support of the proposition that you too ought to see this movie.

Neither of these will be unfamiliar to audiences. What’s noteworthy about this spot, however, is the way in which scenes and dialogue have been cut to support the marketing claim, rather than the marketing claims tailored to movie. Samuel Jackson‘s superhero wrangler Nick Fury appears first with the first word: “You’re up,” which in the absence of a visible interlocuter addresses and convokes the audience. We see quick cuts of Capt. America‘s shield, Iron Man blasting upward and a group shot of the heroes poised for action, as the voice over declares, “the Avengers is the #1 box office opening of all time.” Cut to Tony Stark, “it’s historically awesome,” he says, a reaction wrenched from context but remarkably appropriate here. He’s followed by the Hulk‘s full-throated roar of approbation.

The Voice Over continues, “And, it’s one of the best reviewed films of the year,” as logos for Rolling Stone, Time & USA Today alternate with one word reviews (Epic, fun, exhilarating, heroic, incredible, smashing, daring, spectacular, perfect, amazing triumph, a blast) that proceed in ever increasing pace over scenes of the various superheroes in action. Finally, Scarlett Johansson‘s Black Widow offers the opinion, “you’re gonna love it,” presumably also taken from context, followed by quick cuts of Tony, the Hulk and a final V.O., “The Avengers, rated PG 13, now playing,” over the credit block.

For comparison sake, I decided to take a look at the post-release TV spot for the previous box-office opening weekend champion, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part II.

In this :17 spot, cut after the 169M opening for the final installment of that decade long franchise, the trailermakers chose the same two marketing appeals, but reversed the order.

The spot opens with Voldemort causing mischief and the VO copy: “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is one of the best reviewed movies of the year,” whereupon a “cloud” of logos from the publications in which said reviews ostensibly ran, appears against a dark and stormy sky.

As kinetically edited scenes of action unspool, the V.O. continues, “and the biggest opening in motion picture history,” spoken over a graphic card on which the exact same words are spelled out in the HP font. Dialogue of Harry grappling with Voldemort and leaping from the battlements of Hogwarts (was this scene in the film?) while saying, “let’s finish this as we started, together,” follows, addressing both his antagonist and the audience.

Finally, the VO returns with the exhortation, “don’t miss the best possible end, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part II, rated PG 13,” over a graphic card with the words of the Wall Street Journal’s movie reviewer, Joe Morganstern, “The Best Possible End!”

So, here you have it. When your film opens huge, cut another TV spot to trumpet the news, intimating that your audience will want to participate in such a cultural event. In the event that strong reviews accompany stellar box office, don’t be shy to toot your own horn. It’s a tried and true strategy, that’s been around since the blockbuster era began.

Creative Commons License
movietrailers101 by Fred Greene is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Posted in Observations and Provocations, Readings | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

God Bless America Trailer: Sociopathy and graphic violence OK with the MPAA, but not the "f" word


RED BAND TRAILER

God Bless America is to be released on May 11th, though it already debuted on VOD, April 6th, an indication that its distributor had greater expectations from the “direct to vid” route than theatrical. Bobcat Goldthwait‘s ascerbic “black comedy,” portrays the serial murder spree of a hapless, terminally ill, and eminently “disposable” middle-aged American man and his impetuous young partner, a mal-adapted high-school nymphette.

Appalled and emotionally wounded by the degradation of public life in this our divinely ordained and exceptional nation, the two accidental road-buddies take it upon themselves to punish crimes against civility and decency by murdering those–whether reality TV stars or mere run-of-the-mill assholes–they hold responsible. It’s a pastiche of Bonnie and Clyde, Natural Born Killers and Lolita, although Frank (Joel Murray) resists Roxy’s (Tara Lynn Barr) sexual advances on the principle that exploiting her youth and enthusiasm would make him one of the assholes he’s targeting.

As myself a critic of toxic pop culture, I was sympathetic to Frank and Roxy’s dismay, supportive of their resolve to campaign against toxic cultural programming, though ultimately skeptical of their methods. So, rather than write about the marketing of yet another mind-numbing summer blockbuster, I thought I’d see how a small, personal, mean little satire might position itself within the marketplace of bland, commercial juggernauts.


GREEN TRAILER: APPROVED FOR ALL AUDIENCES

And this is what I noticed first: the all-audiences, “green” trailer was hard to find on Youtube, and when located (far down in the rankings, though available on the official movie website, just below the tab for the Redband one), revealed itself to be nearly identical to the redband version, except for the removal of an obscenity or two. It’s the same cut, the same cues, the same story, conflict, subject matter, tone and the same quantity of undermotivated but gleeful graphic violence.

Unlike in the new Walking Dead video game, where dispatching zombies extracts a psychic toll, killing in God Bless America (a title card graphic shows a Statue of Liberty silhouette around a marksmanship target!) is easy, fun and requires no commitment. Just aim and shoot and the deserving malefactors drop, like the acid quips from our protagonists lips. Frank and Roxy are taking “their ground” on the road and “standing” tall with pistols and shotguns locked and loaded. Unruly, talkative movie goers, smart-phone videographers, parking space hogs, misbehaving reality TV “stars,” and ultimately the talent, judges, host and audience of an American Idol like program eat their lead. It’s wonderfully cathartic!

The MPAA contributes to the satire, inadvertently, I suppose, since what must be removed for a G rating isn’t mature themes or gratuitous violence, but merely the stray, bleeped “f”-bomb. The NRA also approved this preview, it appears.

So who might want to see such a film and how does the trailer address this hypothetical audience? Actually, quite a broad swath of the American public has the potential to enjoy this movie. First, core Bobcat fans; second, afficionados of black comedy; next, haters of reality TV; cranky old people (I count myself among such) who bemoan the decline in civility and cultural emissions production; young men who like guns and violence and jack-ass humor; red state vigilantes and gun enthusiasts; blue state intellectuals who notice how the heroes become complicit in the very behavior they denounce. Wow! As I wrote this list, I began to think that Mr. Goldthwait has summer-blockbuster counter-programming catnip on his hands. (But alas, a marketing budget is, too typically, destiny.]

Formally, the trailer is composed of successive scenes of viewing, interrupted by scenes of action, usually involving an unmediated (i.e. real–face to face, bullet and blood) interaction between spectator and spectacle. Frank flips through channel after channel of corrosive, demeaning programming as he prepares to end his life. In a flashback, his doctor show him a computer monitor shot of his pulsing, inoperable brain tumor, before taking a call that flashes on his mobile screen. Frank and Roxy take in a movie at an actual theater, but are obliged to murder talkative, pop-corn throwing teen neighbors as well as the fellow who captures their gun-play on his video-phone. The then thank a more courteous fellow patron for turning off her phone during the film and the carnage that followed.

The final destination of their road trip is the set of an American Idol like show, onto whose stage and via whose cameras, they beam their own violent, show-stopping, star-making performance into homes around the nation. America’s got talent indeed!!

Have they become themselves the problem? Yessiree Bobcat, which is, the vicious joke of the film, as it is of the trailer. There’s no outside to the closed circuit of screen and viewer, program and polity, trailer and audience. The revolution will be televised; political action and reaction will be represented and commodified, attracting eyeballs with shock and awe visuals, eyeballs that can then be delivering to advertisers, who finance the culture that sells their products.

And yet, Frank and Roxy are heroes, if only for getting off the couch and asserting themselves with the only weapons they have–guns, atrocity, a sense of humor. Disenfranchised, obscure, taken-for-granted, quiet-Americans defend an ideal of civility and quality that while quaint is nevertheless poignant. That they do so in the coarsest, most brutal and dehumanizing way is, well, the irony that undergirds the satire.

God Bless America, indeed! Where else but in a trailer could the passive viewer achieve the apotheosis of becoming the object of his desire and loathing while simultaneously, through a purchase decision, approving the psychological confusion?

It’s a radioactive trailer and the film looks pretty toxic too. See it.

Creative Commons License
movietrailers101 by Fred Greene is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Posted in Observations and Provocations, Readings | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

DIGITAL MARKETING: The Movie Trailer's New Medium


Bugeyes126: Viral videographer: Par of Men in Black 3’s digital campaign

I visited my colleague John Weller’s classroom last night at UCLA, to sample the conversation in his Digital Marketing course, the Spring Quarter installation of the Andrew J. Kuehn Jr. Marketing Series within the Department of Theater, Film & TV’s Producers Program.

While many initiatives undertaken as part of a digital marketing plan explore and exploit publicity and promotion in a non a/v format (twitter feeds, facebook pages and likes, QR codes, Alternate Reality Games, etc.) much of what is being produced for online viewers and would-be ticket buyers can be understood as “special shoot” material. Whether User generated or produced by the distributors and their vendors, the content is audio visual and movie-related or referencing (though sometimes obliquely). While they may not be previews of coming attractions in the strict sense of that term, I’d feel no awkwardness in calling such materials “trailers,” intended to announce, inform and appeal to audiences on behalf of the film or tv title in question.

For example: for Men in Black 3, Sony’s digital marketing department created a series of videos intended for viral dissemination featuring a teenaged MIB enthusiast who purports to believe in the reality of their existence and their mission. Under the name of bugeyes126, he videotapes and posts his efforts to document the activities of agents J (Smith), K (Jones), and perhaps young K (Brolin) too. He’s also invited viewers to call in with their own sightings, experiences and comments related to all things MIB, which are recorded and posted to his youtube channel.

While I’m not bowled over by the Bugeyes premise, the content is inarguably audio-visual material in support of an audio-visual product, my baseline definition of a trailer or preview of coming attraction.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gjqR-phEEa4]

A more interesting example, because I think more obviously engaged with the diegetic world of the film advertised, is the wedding blog for the Five Year Engagement. Imitating the now venerable model of a blog created by a couple planning their nuptials, Emily Blunt and Jason Siegal have posted pictures, comments and videos of themselves and friends as they anticipate and celebrate the blessed day. Have they been specially shot by the marketing department to support the campaign? Or are they actual scenes or outtakes from the production? Who knows. Who cares. What’s important is the presentation of character, tone, title, genre and subject matter implicit in these very personal and “small” short films. There is no question that they’re trailers.

Lastly, for the American Reunion franchise reboot, about which I’ve posted earlier, the official website offers an array of videos and cool features, including trailers, favorite moments from the franchise, facebook timelines for the characters, offers, contests, opportunities to buy the DVD, etc. etc. What I wanted to highlight here, was the Stiffler App, available from Android only since Apple declined it, and personally recommended by the Stifmeister himself.

When I introduce the subject of trailers in conversation, I like to cast a wide net that includes bloopers, clips, outtakes, featurettes, viral videos, user generated videos, teasers and so forth and so on. But the Stifler app? Can that pass the movie preview sniff test? I’m told that with the app, I can “Challenge [my] reflexes and [my] taste buds with Chug It! Get [my] party on with the Kegger Calculator! Hear golden nuggets of wisdom in the Stifler Speak Soundboard (along with some classic lines from the past!).”

Despite how appealing all of these features are and how they develop and reference the diegetic world of the American Pie multi-verse, I suspect (and if I had an Android smart phone, I’d be able to confirm it) that the visual elements of the app are not “moving pictures,” and thus, on the most formal of grounds, cannot qualify for entry into the trailer club. Great try, though, and definitely a boundary crossing, category-challenging piece of code!

I’m collecting examples. Should you know of some gate-crashing aspirants, don’t hesitate to let me know.

Creative Commons License
movietrailers101 by Fred Greene is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Posted in Observations and Provocations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment